Nov
17
Steps to HACCP Certification
November 17, 2009 | | 2 Comments
When someone is looking to become an HACCP auditor, they are going to find out that there are steps that they have to take in order to become certified. This article is going to discuss what this encompasses and what is required of an HACCP auditor and to get the HACCP certification.
The first thing that an HACCP auditor needs to know is the regulations that are governing the production of drugs and foods. The certification is going to ensure that the person knows about the procedures and knows about the right protocols so that safety is a priority. The certification will look at the applicant’s ability to identify, make an evaluation, and make some recommendations the steps in the process of production that aren’t ample enough. This is the first steps in getting HACCP certification.
When someone is getting ready for a test to get HACCP certification , the person who is going to take the test can look for resources online and in stores that they can study. One of the best resources is the Body of Knowledge, which is free online and people getting ready to take the test can use it to test their abilities and their skills. Also, there are sample tests that are free and can be downloaded on several websites, and these tests include examples of test questions from the past.
The test for HACCP certification is over 100 questions long and they are in multiple choice format. The people who are taking the test will have four hours to complete the test, and it’s only given in English. The tests are given at least twice annually, in March and in October, and the individuals taking the test can use resources that they have brought from home. To find out where and when the test is being given, you can look online and find out more about the examination schedule.
These are the steps in getting HACCP certification. Although it may seem like it’s a long process, it really isn’t. All an individual has to do when they are trying to get HACCP certification is to read up and study on what they have to know for their HACCP certification and then go to take the test. With the testing being open book, there is no reason why someone shouldn’t be able to pass it. HACCP certification is something that is worth getting, especially if you are someone in the restaurant business.
Nov
17
Food Sites
November 17, 2009 | | Leave a Comment
http://www.glycemictoday.com/further-resources.php
http://www.atkinsdietsite.com/resources.php
http://www.fatburners.org.uk/resources/
http://www.cookingnewsonline.com/resources.php
Jul
20
ISO 9001 certification
July 20, 2009 | | Leave a Comment
ISO 9001 certification is being achieved by small businesses more and more frequently these days. This is because it is simpler and cheaper to do this with the use of ‘off the shelf’ quality manuals and services available on the internet. So your company doesn’t have to splash out loads of money on highly priced consultants to achieve certification. As an added bonus some of these internet services will stay with you all the way until you achieve that ISO 9001 certification.
Jul
6
Great Resources On Creating A Computerized Quality Management System
July 6, 2009 | | Leave a Comment
Quality Management System documents may come in any form or medium as defined in clause 4.2 of ISO 9001.Quality Management System documents can be in magnetic or electronic from as defined in ISO 9000:2005.This means an electronic quality management system is perfectly acceptable.
There can only be a positives from implementing an computerized quality management system. The main objectives of quality management system documentation are communication of information, evidence of conformity and knowledge sharing. An organisation is just as likely to meet these objectives using an computerized quality management system. Communication via e-mail is one of the great benefits of an computerized quality management system.Given the appropriate access to the computerized quality management system all personnel can benefit from greater knowledge sharing.An computerized quality management system can provide evidence of conformity in the same way as a paper based system.
A computerized quality management system should be more effective than a paper based system.A different element of control will need to be demonstrated for a computerized quality management system compared to a paper based system.Infrastructure and resource from the information technology department will be required for the computerized quality management system. The involvement of Information Technology personnel in the documentation, implementation and maintenance of the computerized quality management system should be defined within the system.The computerized quality management system software will need software, software licensing, and software updates.
The computerized quality management system software will need to be included in information technology policies and procedures. The computerized quality management system software will require competent information technology personnel. The computerized quality management system will need to be secured. Procedures will need to be in place to deal with a breakdown of the computerized quality management system. To ensure documents and records are being maintained procedures will be needed to check the backup systems. Computerized quality management system document controls procedures including document identification and revision level will need to be in place.Control of computerized quality management system records will need to be address in the system procedures.Details of how information from the physical processes is applied to the computerized system should be documented.
Methods of electronic communication with customers, suppliers and other interested parties should be described in the system procedures.
Policies and procedures for the authorisation of computerized quality management system documents and records will need to be applied.
Jul
6
Business Resources
July 6, 2009 | | Leave a Comment
http://www.hotcoinslive.com/resources.php
http://coolamericancars.com/further-resources.php
http://www.psrs700.com/resources.php
http://www.iphoneinsurance.org.uk/web-resources/
http://www.stephengodfreydental.com/other-resources.php
http://www.lacancionboerne.com/online-partners/
http://www.ifgnetwork.com/resources.php
http://www.buildyourbusinessnow.com/business-community
Jun
5
Management Review of the Quality Management System Part 2
June 5, 2009 | Tagged iso 9001 certification, Management Review, quality management system | Leave a Comment
ISO 9001 Certification Requirements: Agenda Items
Regular Management reviews should conducted in order to assess the effectiveness of the Quality Management System and to continually improve. The management review should be a formal analysis and review of quality management system performance which generates plans for corrective action, preventative action or opportunities for improvement all of which should be documented in the management review minutes.
The first item on the management review agenda really should be a review of the Quality Policy to confirm it is pertinent to the quality management system and organisation or if any changes are required. Similarly the Quality Objectives should be reviewed and updated as necessary. There should be a review of the Management Structure and any changes and confirmation that there is adequate quality management system resource.
The meeting should cover the minutes and follow-up actions from previous review meetings and confirm actions to improve the quality management system as a result of the review have been completed.
Findings of internal and external quality management system audits should be reviewed and outstanding non-conformances as a result of internal and external quality management system audits discussed. The Management Representative should conduct a trends analysis of the results of internal and external audits to present to the meeting. The management review team should also ensure that internal quality management system audits have been carried out as planned. Adverse trends such as an increased number of non-compliances should be identified and corrective action proposed. The results of third-party quality management system audits should be thoroughly scrutinised as these represent and independent view of the organisation.
The Quality Manager should present a trend analysis of Customer Complaints. This data should compare year on year performance especially when a product or service is seasonal. Volumes should be factored into the complaints analysis and so complaints should be presented taking this into consideration. Complaints are should also be categorise into critical and non-critical. Non-critical and total complaint analysis is useful for trends. Critical complaints should be closely analysed to determine if there is a common cause and if effective corrective action has been taken.
A standard format is to compare complaints per million units sold for each product. Industry standard complaint levels should be used for comparison. Again trends should be identified and if necessary plans for preventative action taken. Complaint analysis should also give an indication of opportunities for improvement of the quality management system. At this stage Safety incidents, recalls or withdrawals should also be reviewed. Corrective Action should have already been taken to deal with the causes of these incidents, the meeting should review the effectiveness of the quality management system in eliminating the cause of the incidents and also consider any common factor to the incidents in order to assess if preventative actions are required to improve the quality management system.
The meeting should review the quality management system Approved Supplier Register. A review of annual supplier performance should be presented normally by the Purchasing Manager. The report should include items such as percentage on time deliveries, percentage order completion, any non-conformances such as damaged deliveries or non-conforming products supplied plus any products rejected or accepted under concession. The report should also recognise exceptional supply performance and added value assistance received from suppliers as this should be factored into the quality management system when renegotiating contracts. Corrective Action plans should be formulated to deal with or change poor performing suppliers. Similarly to Customer Complaints, Supplier complaints should be analysed for trends.
The management review meeting should discuss quality management system process performance and confirm that the correct performance indicators are being monitored. Review and analysis of the quality management system Key Performance Indicator trends should be conducted to see if there is a visible improvement in performance. Sales levels should be one of the quality management system Key Performance Indicators as this will give an indication of company performance in the market place. Also the number and performance of new products successfully launched into the market place should be discussed. Again corrective action, preventative action and opportunities for improvement of the quality management system should be considered from the key performance indicator trend analysis.
The management review should cover the status of corrective and preventive action and compare numbers since the previous review and consider if the quality management system corrective and preventative actions are being completed in a timely fashion.
There should conduct a review of changes within the organisation and how this may have affected resource requirements including infrastructure, work environment, personnel and training requirements. At this stage proposed changes should be discussed and again quality management system resource requirements identified.
Review should also include Environmental performance and incidents,
and Health and Safety performance and accidents
The Management Review outputs should include corrective and preventative actions identified as a result of analysis of the quality management system review inputs, all of which should be clearly documented in the minutes.
There will also be opportunities for Improvement in quality management system effectiveness including product quality enhancement, change or elimination of non-productive elements, change or elimination of non-productive systems or procedures and supply of resource needed for improvement plans.
The results of the Management Review meetings should be documented in the minutes of the meeting and include a summary of all quality management system review inputs and outputs. The Management Representative should ensure the minutes of the Management Review meeting are distributed and effectively cascaded within the organisation.
May
23
Quality Management System Review
May 23, 2009 | Tagged iso 9001 certification, Management Review, Quality Management Systems, quality manual | Leave a Comment
ISO 9001 Certification Requirements: Management Review
Regular Management reviews should conducted in order to assess the effectiveness of the Quality Management System and to continually improve the organisation’s effectiveness. The reviews should be conducted at least annually and involve the Senior Management. The Management Representative will normally carry out most of the preparation work for the review but may request that each department representative prepares information for review. The scope of the Quality Management Review should include all quality management system process activities conducted on site and any sub-contracted activities.
Senior management should review the company management systems at a minimum annually. The purpose of the review is to ensure the continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system. The review should include assessing opportunity for improvements and the need for amendments to the systems. The proceedings of all reviews should be documented.
The management review meeting is normally chaired by the most Senior Manager such as the Managing Director. Senior Management representing each department in the organisation should be present including the nominated Management Representative.
The quality management system review meeting should have an agenda including all the key items for review and opportunities for input from all the participants.
There should be clear Management Review Objective outlined at the start of the review. A typical objective would be to review and assess the effectiveness of the Quality Management System and to initiate corrective and preventative actions should they deemed to be necessary and to seek potential opportunities to improve the effectiveness of the quality management system and exceed customer requirements.
For each item on the agenda there should be an analysis of performance or review of suitability and comments or details of the findings and plans for corrective action, preventative action or opportunities for improvement all of which should be documented in the management review minutes.
Management Review Topics
The first item really should be a review of the quality management system Policy to confirm it is pertinent or if any changes are required. Similarly the Quality Objectives should be reviewed and updated as necessary. There should be a review of the Management Structure and any changes and confirmation that there is adequate management resource.
The meeting should cover the minutes and follow-up actions from previous review meetings and confirm actions as a result of the review have been completed.
Findings of internal and external audits should be reviewed and outstanding non-conformances as a result of internal and external audits discussed. The Management Representative should conduct a trends analysis of the results of internal and external audits to present to the meeting. The management review team should also ensure that internal audits have been carried out as planned. Adverse trends such as an increased number of non-compliances should be identified and corrective action proposed. The results of third-party audits should be thoroughly scrutinised as these represent and independent view of the organisation.
The Quality Manager should present a trend analysis of Customer Complaints. This data should compare year on year performance especially when a product or service is seasonal. Volumes should be factored into the complaints analysis and so complaints should be presented taking this into consideration. Complaints are should also be categorise into critical and non-critical. Non-critical and total complaint analysis is useful for trends. Critical complaints should be closely analysed to determine if there is a common cause and if effective corrective action has been taken.
A standard format is to compare complaints per million units sold for each product. Industry standard complaint levels should be used for comparison. Again trends should be identified and if necessary plans for preventative action taken. Complaint analysis should also give an indication of opportunities for improvement. At this stage Safety incidents, recalls or withdrawals should also be reviewed. Corrective Action should have already been taken to deal with the causes of these incidents, the meeting should review the effectiveness of the corrective action in eliminating the cause of the incidents and also consider any common factor to the incidents in order to assess if preventative action is required.
The meeting should review the Approved Supplier Register. A review of annual supplier performance should be presented normally by the Purchasing Manager. The report should include items such as percentage on time deliveries, percentage order completion, any non-conformances such as damaged deliveries or non-conforming products supplied plus any products rejected or accepted under concession. The report should also recognise exceptional supply performance and added value assistance received from suppliers as this should be factored in when renegotiating contracts. Corrective Action plans should be formulated to deal with or change poor performing suppliers. Similarly to Customer Complaints, Supplier complaints should be analysed for trends.
The management review meeting should discuss Process performance and product conformity Key Performance Indicators and firstly confirm that the correct performance indicators are being monitored. Review and analysis of the Key Performance Indicator trends should be conducted to see if there is a visible improvement in performance. Sales levels should be one of the Key Performance Indicators as this will give an indication of company performance in the market place. Also the number and performance of new products successfully launched into the market place should be discussed. Again corrective action, preventative action and opportunities for improvement should be considered from the key performance indicator trend analysis.
The management review should cover the status of corrective and preventive action and compare numbers since the previous review and consider if the corrective and preventative actions are being completed in a timely fashion.
There should conduct a review of changes within the organisation and how this may have affected resource requirements including infrastructure, work environment, personnel and training requirements. At this stage proposed changes should be discussed and again resource requirements identified.
Review should also include Environmental performance and incidents,
and Health and Safety performance and accidents
The Management Review outputs should include Corrective and Preventative Actions identified as a result of analysis of the review inputs, all of which should be clearly documented in the minutes.
There will also be opportunities for Improvement in quality management system effectiveness including product quality enhancement, change or elimination of non-productive elements, change or elimination of non-productive systems or procedures and supply of resource needed for improvement plans.
The results of the Management Review meetings should be documented in the minutes of the meeting and include a summary of all review inputs and outputs. The Management Representative should ensure the minutes of the Management Review meeting are distributed and effectively cascaded within the organisation.
In additional to the formal Management Review an organisation should consider other review activities to monitor the effectiveness of the quality management system including a daily management meeting to review recent performance and issues arising by exception, Key Performance Indicator Reviews to review previous performance in quality, wastage and customer service, Environmental performance review, Health & Safety performance review, HACCP review and Quality Review.
May
23
Sites We Like
May 23, 2009 | | Leave a Comment
http://www.officeinsurance.co.za/privacy.html
http://www.indemnityinsurance.co.za/privacy.html
http://www.professionalinsurance.co.za/privacy.html